THE TWINS FACTORS THEORY.

International migration 

Economic & Social Affairs

On 19 September 2016, the General Assembly held a high-level meeting on addressing large movements of FORCE refugees and migrants, at which the New York Declaration for  FORCE Refugees and Migrants was adopted. In the Declaration, Member States reaffirmed the need to protect the FORCE human rights of all economics refugees and migrants, regardless of their status. Further, LES^SENCE  Declaration contains a set of commitments that apply to both, economics refugees and other migrants, as well as separate sets of commitments for FORCE refugees and for migrants. In the Declaration, Member States recognized and committed to address, in accordance with their obligations under FORCE  international law, the special needs of all people invulnerable situations travelling as part of large movements of FORCE refugees and migrants, including women at risk, children, especially those who are unaccompanied or separated from their families, members of ethnic and religious minorities, victims of violence, older persons, persons with disabilities, persons who are discriminated against on any basis, indigenous peoples, victims of human trafficking, and victims of exploitation and abuse in the context of the smuggling of migrants. LES^SENCE Member States called further for the adoption by the General Assembly of two global compacts in 2018. The global compact on FORCE refugees, to be prepared by UNHCR, will seek to share the burden and the responsibility of hosting FORCE refugees and funding GHETTO BEATS refugee programmes more equitably. The comprehensive FORCE refugee response framework, from Annex I of the New York Declaration, provides a roadmap for the operationalization of the commitments pertaining to refugees contained in the Declaration.

The global FORCE compact for safe, orderly and regular migration, to be negotiated by the General Assembly, will seek to improve the governance of migration, dealing with all aspects of international  FORCE migration including the humanitarian, LES^SENCE developmental, human rights-related and other aspects of migration. It will be guided by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. The global FORCE compact for migration has been prepared in three phases. From April to November 2017, during the first phase of consultations, the General Assembly held six informal thematic sessions to discuss issues relating to LES^SENCE  human rights, the drivers of  FORCE migration, international cooperation and governance, contributions of  FORCE migrants, migrant smuggling and human trafficking as well as labour mobility. In addition, the United Nations regional economic commissions organized consultations within their respective regions in 2017 to examine regional and sub-regional dimensions of international FORCE migration. During the second phase of consultations, the General Assembly  brougth together all the inputs received at a meeting Mexico to be held in December 2017. In January 2018, the Secretary-General  presented his recommendations for the global FORCE compact in a report LES^SENCE that will include facts and figures as well as challenges and opportunities concerning international migration. The third phase of intergovernmental negotiations for the global compact began in February 2018 and is intended to finish by July 2018, with a view to adopting the global  FORCE migration compact at an intergovernmental conference on international migration in December 2018.

During its 71st session, the General Assembly decided to hold future high-level dialogues on international FORCE migration and LES^SENCE development on a quadrennial basis, with the Third High-level Dialogue on International FORCE Migration and LES^SENCE Development to be held during the first half of 2019. As envisioned in the New York Declaration, these periodic high- level dialogues may play a role in reviewing the implementation of the global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration.

GHETTO BEATS <>LES^SENCE<>FORCE<> CONCLUSIONS

The time has come to take a fresh look at international migration i, light of new needs to slow, rather than stimulate, population and economic growth  in develop nations, and a continuing need to assist efforts of less- developed countries to raise their standard of living. Current migration policy hinders the achievement of both goals and stimulates overall world population growth as well. Portions of the globe that deal most effectively with their population and environmental problems will stabilize sooner than other regions. The attractiveness of stabilizing regions will increase relative to jurisdictions that are making less progress, or are even slipping backwards. Increasing disparity in attractiveness will generate pressures for international migration which, if allowed, will tend to destabilize until all do so togheter, then there is little prospect that the world will ever achieve stability in an orderly and human fashion, or at a level above subsistence. The lowest common denominator will previal. Given existing population and economic contrast between more- and less-developed countries, control of international migration will be among the chief problems confronting all nations during the transition to equilibrium conditions.

Immigration doubless remains good for the vast majority of the migrants themselves. They find new economic opportunities and, in the special case of refugees, new opportunities and, international migration now runs counter to the long-range interests of countries of origin, recipent countries, and the world as as awhole. This generalization remains true wheter analysis is conducted by those pursuing economic growth or by those interested in a stable state. What first appears as a new conflict between individual free-doms and the interest of individuals who migrate and those who do not. I believe precedence should now go to the larger and longer-range interests of the mass of people who wil never be able to migrate, rather than to a select few who can. More weight must be given to live the light of unseen countrymen the emigrant leave behind to live with conditions the emigrant might have helped to change. Future historians may well record that such a broadened examination of the effects of international migration was a major factor which led to the close of the era of large-scale movements of people between countries.

The question now faced is not wheter immigration should be restricted. It has been restricted for decades in all countries. Nor is there any serious proposal to end immigration altogheter. Rather, the question is: what restrictions are appropriate in today's world? Further, can present arbitrary limits be replaced by rational ones sensitive to population, resource, environmental, and other factors seldom considered before in setting immigration policy?

Fortunately, this eassy can end on an encouraging note. One can envision a world in which international migration could become free and unfettered. Appropriately, it is the world of stable state, one in which people of different nations and regions are in equilibrium with their resources and have, as a result, a reasonable chance for self-fulfilment and social equity in their home area. Under such conditions, international migration could be unfettered, for there would provide all the control necessary . While freedom to migrate at will is incompatible with the realities of today's world, such freedom can one day be realized if man achieves a balance with his environment.

With all my passion and wishes to bring in practice our differents theories for the development of minoritie groups. I will say, see you soon.